|
Page 4 of 4
There’s
a lot of speculation about why 60% of CRM installations fail, but in my
view, I think a significant factor is the inherent dichotomy in the basic
assumption – CRM is too frequently nothing to do with customer relationships,
and everything to do with customer profitability. Customers know that,
of course, and respond with cynicism and mistrust.
Jack
Welch says that in restructuring GE he asked his managers to interrogate
every process with the question “Is this good for the customer”?
I’d take that a step further, and say “If I was the customer,
is this how I would like to be treated?” If you can answer yes to
that question, then you’ve probably got a pretty good level of trust
from your customers.
I
think embedding an ethical framework in the organization’s culture
is also an important part of building trust, both internally and externally.
If there is confidence in the intrinsic fairness of the people and processes
of an organization, then trust can flourish.
My
fifth, and final challenge is this: How can organizations develop an equilibrium
that acknowledges the inter-connectedness of all our stakeholder groups
– our shareholders, our suppliers, our employees, government, the
community. The writer John Ralston Saul is a guest at this year’s
Sydney Writer’s Festival, and his most recent book “On Equilibrium”
I commend to you.
His
book is an intelligent, persuasive defense of all our human qualities
– commonsense, memory, imagination, reason, ethics and intuition.
and argues that if we were to value all our qualities equally, we might
have a more balanced, humane society.
It
was his plea for a return to commonsense I found most compelling. He defines
commonsense as using our shared experiences to draw conclusions about
the likelihood of future events. The example that he uses is famine. He
argues that we now have sufficient experience of the events that precipitate
the regular famines that so decimate the horn of Africa to be able to
predict with some certainty when they are likely to occur.
If
we were to use our commonsense, we would start moving relief aid in as
soon as we saw these conditions aligning, or even better, work together
to prevent them happening. Instead, reason demands that we wait for evidence
– and it is only when we start seeing emaciated bodies on the evening
news that we seem able to motivate ourselves to get involved.
Both
the public and private sectors these days make much of their commitment
to evidence-based assessments – and that’s a very reasonable
thing to do – but if we want to maintain our competitive advantage
through innovation and new product development then qualities such as
imagination, intuition, memory and commonsense are equally important.
To rely on reason, to the exclusion of all else, is unreasonable. Can
I urge you to reflect on the importance of equilibrium, both in your organization,
and to you personally.
|